Information contained in this section will highlight the finer details of writing up your findings and discussion sections. George Mason University; Discussion. The introductory paragraph contains the main idea of performing the study in question. Relatedly, reading and IMing at the same time may also not have stretched their abilities as multitaskers.
For example you might write: What parts would it need. Besides application of a template which contains the intended clear-cut messages to be followed will contribute to the communication of net messages. Tell the reader what they need to know and try to organise the information in a way that makes the most sense to you and your project.
By this point, the reader has gone through your findings and is now looking for your interpretation. Many people find talking an easier way to get ideas out.
In addition, a pre-peer review process is recommended to obtain feedback on the manuscript. It needs to demonstrate how you have attempted to answer your research questions.
While this might seem tedious at first, filling in the sections with the appropriate information will mean that you are not writing things over and over again. The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Whatever program you have used, make sure that you document what you have done and the variables that have affected your analysis.
What might make the machine break. Conclusions and Implications Write a reference list using appropriate style such as the American Psychological Association A. An ethnographer might devote a chapter to each theory they have built from observation.
Add permission letters and a sample of participants' consent forms. These parts usually appear in the discussion and ask you to employ your critical thinking skills to demonstrate how your research fits into the bigger picture. In summary Hopefully, you now have some insight into how to prepare your dissertation findings and discussion sections.
If you decide to combine these two concepts, it is important that you cover all of your required topics in a systematic way. Your discussion section allows you to take a fresh perspective on your findings, so you can dig deep and provide new and original ideas from your research.
As a writer, it is important to address both these challenges. University College Writing Centre. This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your analysis.
You should frame your suggestions by linking the need for further research to the limitations of your study [e. By now, you should know what you are going to write about. References Include extra data sets and diagrams illustrating analysis.
However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. You need to keep in mind that the IMRAD structure is best used to write up empirical research work the type where you collect data of some kind. I hope some of these suggestions help to get you started.
In the light of these principles, as is the case in our daily practice, all components of the manuscript IMRAD can be written concurrently. Each paragraph should not contain more than words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly. On the other hand references should be promptly put in place while writing the manuscript, Sorting, and placement of the references should not be left to the last moment.
Use established sources, previous studies and support with statistics where possible. Well, your findings chapter is sort of like a really lame movie script.
Examples Opening Paragraph -- restate RQ, then provide major result Overall, attitudes and perceptions of both urban and rural primary care patients in this sample show that they are generally receptive to the possibility of receiving medical and psychiatric services via telehealth.
An example would be: You need to tell them what they need to know right from the beginning. If appropriate, note any unusual or unanticipated patterns or trends that emerged from your results and explain their meaning in relation to the research problem. Sep 09, · In the discussion, you write more interpretatively and colorfully about the results.
Whereas you kept it concise in the dissertation conclusion, you write more in-depth about the subject in the discussion section/5(). The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by.
Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all. You need to keep in mind that the IMRAD structure is best used to write up empirical research work (the type where you collect data of some kind).
A good strategy is to always re-read the background section of your paper after you have written up your results to ensure that the reader has enough context to understand the results [and, later, how you interpreted the results in the discussion section of your paper].
The results section of any qualitative report should be much longer than this example and provide more detail, including more justification for why you chose your themes, but this example provides an idea of the approach you need to take. SAGE Video Bringing teaching, learning and research to life.
SAGE Books The ultimate social sciences digital library. SAGE Reference The complete guide for your research journey. SAGE Navigator The essential social sciences literature review tool. SAGE Business Cases Real world cases at your fingertips. CQ Press Your definitive resource for politics, policy and people.How to write a good qualitative discussion section